Legal Opinion

Smith v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 18, 1988No. Appeal, No. 2525 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

William Smith (Petitioner) appeals from an October 2, 1987 decision of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) denying his request for administrative relief from his recommitment as a technical parole violator (TPV). We affirm.

On September 10, 1987 the Board recommitted Petitioner as a TPV for violating condition 5C of his parole—assaultive behavior. Before this court, Petitioner contends the finding that he violated this condition is not supported by substantial evidence because it is based on a medical report, admitted over Petitioners counsels…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Game Commission v. BowmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Smith v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pana v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API