Legal Opinion
Morin v. Trupin
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 12, 1989No. 88 Civ. 5743 (RWS), 89 Civ. 3102 (RWS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Various defendants in the consolidated actions Morin v. Trupin and Peterson v. Trupin have moved to disqualify the law firm of Adler Hindy Turner & Glasser and its co-counsel, Manning, Raab, Dealy & Sturm, attorneys for all plaintiffs in these actions, from continuing to represent plaintiffs, and for ancillary relief. The motion is based upon disclosures that were made to plaintiffs’ counsel by a defendant, Harvey Haber (“Haber”), who once served as in-house counsel to a number of the defendants. Those disclosures, alleged to breach the confidential…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Michael F. Armstrong v. Clovis McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Board Of Education Of The City Of New York v. Ewald NyquistCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States Football League v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michele SINDONA, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Emle Industries, Inc. v. Patentex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morin v. TrupinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Morin v. TrupinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Morin v. TrupinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Morin v. TrupinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Ackerman v. National Property Analysts, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.