State ex rel. Strother v. Broaddus
Supreme Court of Missouri
Prohibition. (1) It is alleged in the amended answer that defendant had been adjudged a bankrupt in the Federal court. It was conceded in the trial by attorney for J. W. Bowman, the plaintiff in said cause, that “that was one of defendant’s (relator’s) defenses,” and in relator’s application (in the nature of a motion for a rehearing) for discharge the following argument with the authorities therefor was presented and is now pending in the court of bankruptcy.
Read the full summary
Prohibition. (1) It is alleged in the amended answer that defendant had been adjudged a bankrupt in the Federal court. It was conceded in the trial by attorney for J. W. Bowman, the plaintiff in said cause, that “that was one of defendant’s (relator’s) defenses,” and in relator’s application (in the nature of a motion for a rehearing) for discharge the following argument with the authorities therefor was presented and is now pending in the court of bankruptcy. “The bankrupt is entitled to a discharge as a matter of right unless he has committed some of the offenses enumerated in the act.” In…
1Opinion of the CourtKennish, J.
— This is an original proceeding in which the relators, Ben S. Strother and Nellie M. Strother, applied by petition for a writ of prohibition against the respondents, the Judges of the Kansas -City Court of Appeals.
The petition was filed with the clerk of this court on the 7th day of July, 1910. A preliminary rule was awarded on the 29th day of the same month, directed to the respondents, commanding them to desist and refrain from any further proceedings in a certain action *364in the said court of appeals, in which relators were plaintiffs in error and one J. W. Bowman was' defendant in error,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eyster v. GaffSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- State ex rel. Campbell v. St. Louis Court of AppealsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- State ex rel. Rogers v. RombauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Klingelhoefer v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- State ex rel. Haughey v. RyanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Boll v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Allard v. EstesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- State Ex Rel. Siegel v. StrotherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Argeropoulos v. Kansas City Railways Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1919
- Jennings v. Industrial Paper Stock Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.