Flood v. Southland Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1ConcurrenceO’Connor, J.
(concurring in part and dissenting in part, with whom Lynch, J., joins). I agree that the trial judge erred in not putting to the jury the question whether Darcy intentionally stabbed the plaintiff. Also, I agree that, if the case against Southland Corporation (Southland) is retried, Darcy’s guilty pleas should be admitted in evidence against the plaintiff and Darcy. However, I do not agree that the case against Southland ought to be remanded for a new trial. In my view, the judge erred in denying Southland’s motions *74for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Stone v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Falk v. FinkelmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Carey v. New Yorker of Worcester, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.