Burmeister v. Peterson
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JEANNETTE BURMEISTER., Case No. 22-cv-03178-AMO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 DANIEL PETERSON, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 55 Defendants. 11 12 13 Before the Court is Defendants Dr. Daniel Peterson and Sierra Internal Medicines’ 14 (collectively, the “Peterson Defendants”) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. 15 Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal 16 authority, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion to dismiss, for the following…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music PublishingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.