Legal Opinion

State v. Roybal

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2010No. 20080776PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 Defendant Jose Baltarcar Roybal was convicted of one count of driving under the influence of alcohol. Before trial, he moved to suppress the admission of the evidence obtained from a traffic stop, arguing that the traffic stop constituted an unreasonable search and seizure in violation of his rights under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as well as article I, section 14 of the Utah Constitution. The district court denied his motion to suppress, but the court of appeals reversed. We granted certiorari on one issue — whether the majority…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Salt Lake City v. StreetCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  3. State v. HinmonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  4. State v. NavarroCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  5. State v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API