Legal Opinion

Hendley v. Chicago & Nortwestern Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1929PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

We are satisfied that the demurrer by the railroad company to this complaint on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action as against such defendant was properly sustained.

Reliance is placed by appellant upon sec. 343.487, Stats., found in the chapter regulating offenses against property, and making it unlawful to stop railroad trains upon a highway crossing outside of cities for longer than ten minutes except in cases of accident, and where the penalty is a fine or imprisonment of the employee only in charge of such train or responsible…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DillonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1921
  2. McGlauflin v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Yano v. Stott Briquet Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Evans v. Erie R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  5. Fannin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GillespieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Crosby v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Capelle v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Butts v. WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Morley v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API