Ford Motor Company v. Department of Treasury
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.
In this case, we must determine what actions a taxpayer must take under MCL 205.30 of the Revenue Act to trigger the accrual of interest on a tax refund. We hold that in order to trigger the accrual of interest, the plain language of the statute requires a taxpayer to (1) pay the disputed tax, (2) make a “claim” or “petition” for a refund, and (3) “file” the claim or *386petition. Although a “claim” or “petition” need not take any specific form, it must clearly demand, request, or assert a right to a refund of tax payments made to the Department of Treasury that the taxpayer asserts are not due.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Klooster v. City of CharlevoixMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Detroit v. Ambassador Bridge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Tad Malpass v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Heather Lynn Hannay v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- Tomra of North America Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Midamerican Energy Company v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Ford Motor Company v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Garfield Mart Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.