Legal Opinion

State v. Brownlee

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 27, 1995No. 2313PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Howard, Acting Judge:

Cecil Brownlee was convicted of possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute. Brownlee appeals the denial of his motion for a directed verdict. He also appeals the trial court’s refusal to charge the jury on the law regarding mere presence. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

On a motion for a directed verdict in a criminal case, the trial court is concerned with the existence or nonexistence of evidence, not its weight. State v. Morgan, 282 S.C. 409, 319 S.E. (2d) 335 (1984); State v. Barksdale, — S.C. —, 428 S.E. (2d) 498 (Ct. App. 1993). The motion should be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SchrockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. KimbrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. AustinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. MorganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fleming v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. PaganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API