State v. Brownlee
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Howard, Acting Judge:
Cecil Brownlee was convicted of possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute. Brownlee appeals the denial of his motion for a directed verdict. He also appeals the trial court’s refusal to charge the jury on the law regarding mere presence. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
On a motion for a directed verdict in a criminal case, the trial court is concerned with the existence or nonexistence of evidence, not its weight. State v. Morgan, 282 S.C. 409, 319 S.E. (2d) 335 (1984); State v. Barksdale, — S.C. —, 428 S.E. (2d) 498 (Ct. App. 1993). The motion should be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. SchrockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- State v. KimbrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fleming v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- State v. PaganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.