Legal Opinion

Fleming v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 14, 2003No. 45, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

The question in this case is whether the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on “mere presence” at the scene of a crime.

William Fleming, petitioner, was charged with possession with intent to distribute controlled dangerous substances, possession of controlled dangerous substances and felon in possession of a handgun. Following one mistrial, 1 a second jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City convicted Fleming of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, Maryland Code (1957, 1996 Repl-Vol., 2000 Supp.) Article 27, § 286 (current version at Maryland Code…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. WolfeMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Dawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Cost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Carroll v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Brogden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Rich v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API