Legal Opinion

Yeshiva Achei Tmimim Lubavitz of Worcester, Inc. v. Baylis

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided August 4, 2004No. 012586PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcCann, J.

INTRODUCTION

Attorney for the plaintiffs — Burton Chandler, Esq. Attorney for the defendant — Michael H. Riley, Esq.

*144The plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint is in one count in the nature of a Declaratory Judgment seeking to obtain a determination of the terms of a trust. The answer of the defendant is a general denial of the substantive allegations and three affirmative defenses: (1) lack of standing of plaintiffs; (2) failure to join the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts as an indispensable parly under Rule 19; and (3) unclean hands.

The Court, in a Memorandum of Decision,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Ass'n of Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers, Inc. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. School Committee of Cambridge v. Superintendent of SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. City of Boston v. Keene Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Dillaway v. BurtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Bello v. South Shore HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Yeshiva Achei Tmimim Lubavitz of Worcester, Inc. v. BaylisMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API