Legal Opinion
Houser v. Matson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 23, 1971No. Nos. 25074, 25075PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRED M. TAYLOR, District Judge:
These consolidated actions were brought by appellees and cross-appellants (employees) against appellants and cross-appellees (employer) under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq., to recover amounts allegedly due for overtime work performed during the years 1965 and 1966, together with liquidated damages and attorney’s fees.
The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b) and 28 U.S.C.A. § 1337. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291.
The trial court, after trial without a jury, found and concluded that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Rural Fire Protection Company, a Corporation v. William E. HeppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- General Electric Co. v. Porter. Porter v. General Electric CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United Slate, Tile and Composition Roofers, Damp and Waterproof Workers Association, Local 307 v. G & M Roofing and Sheet Metal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Some Seto, Individually and Doing Business as Tony of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Rau v. Darling's Drug Store, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Houser v. MatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Rogers v. Fansteel, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.