Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Fansteel, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 14, 1981No. Civ. 79-74798PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHURCHILL, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a former employee of the defendant, brought this action for damages for age discrimination under the provisions of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (hereinafter “ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 626(b). The Court ordered a bifurcated trial. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $24,298 damages. Subsequently, the plaintiff was denied additional equitable relief. The only issue remaining to be determined prior to entry of final judgment is the plaintiff’s entitlement to an amount of attorney fees.
The plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Northcross v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- George McClanahan and William Clinger v. William B. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- Andrew P. KELLY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Williamson v. BelovichOhio Court of Appeals · 1993