Legal Opinion

Steinhardt Bros. & Co. v. Cohen

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 14, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, V. C.

The rule to show cause in this case should be made absolute. The rule directed to the complainant was to show cause why a final decree taken in the above-entitled case should not be opened and the executors permitted to file a cross-bill. It was *324urged by the solicitors for the complainant that the relief prayed for be refused, inasmuch as the executors had not applied for the opening of the decree within the time allowed for an appeal. Eor a full understanding of the matter, the following facts in the case are set forth:

On September 10th, 1906, Sophia Cohen and Morris Cohen, her…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cameron v. Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  2. Crandol v. GarrisonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  3. Harrington Co. v. BogertNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  4. Administrator of Wildrick v. SwainNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API