Legal Opinion

Harrington Co. v. Bogert

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 16, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

My attention was first directed to the proceedings in this matter upon an application for a rule to show cause why a final decree to foreclose a tax lien should not be opened and set aside. Upon return of the rule, argument was heard and a decision was reached opening the decree. The original proceeding in this matter was a suit to foreclose a tax lien amounting to seventy-nine dollars and eighty-nine cents ($79.89) and this had progressed to the entry of the final decree. The property affected was shown to be in excess of sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) in value.

The action to foreclose the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boyer v. BoyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1910
  2. Bourgeois v. Risley Real Estate Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
  3. Welles v. SchafferNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  4. Harrington Co. v. HorsterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
  5. Schaffer v. HurdNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 2435 Plainfield Avenue, Inc. v. Township of Scotch Plains (In Re 2435 Plainfield Avenue, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  2. Government Security Co. v. NassoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Harrington Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API