Harrington Co. v. Bogert
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
My attention was first directed to the proceedings in this matter upon an application for a rule to show cause why a final decree to foreclose a tax lien should not be opened and set aside. Upon return of the rule, argument was heard and a decision was reached opening the decree. The original proceeding in this matter was a suit to foreclose a tax lien amounting to seventy-nine dollars and eighty-nine cents ($79.89) and this had progressed to the entry of the final decree. The property affected was shown to be in excess of sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) in value.
The action to foreclose the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boyer v. BoyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1910
- Bourgeois v. Risley Real Estate Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
- Welles v. SchafferNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Harrington Co. v. HorsterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
- Schaffer v. HurdNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 2435 Plainfield Avenue, Inc. v. Township of Scotch Plains (In Re 2435 Plainfield Avenue, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Government Security Co. v. NassoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Harrington Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929