Legal Opinion
Weiss v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibbs, J.
Plaintiff seeks under the terms of an automobile liability policy issued by the defendant company to one Max Oppenheimer as the insured to recover the amount of a judgment previously obtained by plaintiff against said Oppenheimer. Execution on said judgment has been returned unsatisfied and is claimed to be uncollectible against the insured by reason of his alleged insolvency.
The original action was for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in a collision between an automobile owned and driven by Oppenheimer, the insured, and an automobile in which plaintiff was a passenger. In…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brassil v. . Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Miller v. Union Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Schoenfeld v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Farrell v. Merchants Mutual Automobile Liability InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Hermance v. Globe Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Clements v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- St. Louis Architectural Iron Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York v. ColthurstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Clougherty v. Royal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.