Legal Opinion

Washington v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1979No. 40617PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Civil suit seeking damages for malicious prosecution (Count I) and negligent maintenance of business property (Count II). The trial court directed a verdict for defendant on Count II at the close of all the evidence. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff on *138Count I in the amount of $1,500. Plaintiff appeals. We reverse as to Count I and affirm as to Count II.

Plaintiff first complains the trial court erred by embellishing pattern instruction MAI 2.01. The cautionary instruction, as embellished, is set out in full in an appendix to this opinion.

Most of the comments of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCory v. KnowlesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. City of Jackson v. BarksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Johnson v. MurphyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Chapman ex rel. Chapman v. BradleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Syn, Inc. v. BeebeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. State v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Duebelbeis v. DohackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Milford v. May Department Stores Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. ZahnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API