Legal Opinion

Schenk v. HNA Holdings, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 2005No. COA03-1094-2, COA03-1095-2PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs’ appeals in these cases present to this Court identical questions of law; therefore, we have consolidated the appeals pursuant to Rule 40 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. N.C. R. App. P. 40 (2005). The appeals arise from lawsuits in which plaintiffs sought compensatory and punitive damages from defendant, HNA Holdings, Inc., for alleged occupational exposure to asbestos dust and fibers at defendant’s polyester manufacturing plant.

Summarized only to the extent necessary for an understanding of the issues raised on appeal, the evidence at trial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Matter of MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Viar v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Davis v. Dennis Lilly Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Branham v. Denny Roll & Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Everhart v. O'CHARLEY'S INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Dorothy Smith v. Schlage Lock Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  3. Hairston v. HarwardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  4. George v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Maurer v. Slickedit, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API