Pearson v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion
UMNIIDTEDDL ES TDAISTTERS IDCITS TORFI FCLTO CROIDURAT TAMPA DIVISION RACHEL PEARSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CASE NO. 8:22-cv-1530-SDM-AEP SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ______________________________________/ ORDER After Tropical Storm Eta damaged Rachel Pearson’s home, Pearson and her insurer, Scottsdale Insurance Company, disputed whether Pearson’s roof leaked from wind damage, which the policy covers, or from “expansion and contraction,” which the policy excludes. Despite invoking her contractual right to appraisal, Pear- son sued Scottsdale in state court before the appraisal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pardo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Wollard v. Lloyd's & Companies of Lloyd'sSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Menendez v. Progressive Express Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Haven Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. KirianSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.