Legal Opinion

Franzen v. G. R. Kinney Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The defendant contends that the assignment of the lease to the mortgagee as collateral security for the mortgage debt added nothing whatever to the plaintiff’s rights to the rents of the premises for the reason that the assignment of the rents as collateral security makes the assignment in law nothing but a mortgage of the rents, and the only way in which a mortgagee can secure payment of rents to apply upon the mortgage debt is through an action to foreclose the mortgage and the appointment of a receiver therein. It is claimed that from this it follows that the landlord is entitled to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grether v. NickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Ottman v. TilburyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Thomson v. ErskineAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901
  4. Zimmermann v. Walgreen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Gotta (In Re Gotta)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1985
  3. Darling Shop of Birmingham, Inc. v. Nelson Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Darling Shop of Birmingham, Inc. v. Nelson Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. State Bulding & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API