Legal Opinion
Troll Company v. Uneeda Doll Company, Docket No. 05-6487-Cv
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 13, 2007No. 150PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal, concerning so-called “restored” copyrights, requires the Court to construe for the first time section 104A of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 104A, which was enacted in its present form as part of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (“URAA”), Pub.L. No. 103-465, 108 Stat. 4809 (1994). The Defendant-Appellant, Uneeda Doll Co. (“Uneeda”), appeals from the November 28, 2005, order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Richard Owen, District Judge), preliminarily enjoining Uneeda from manufacturing, distributing, or selling “Wish-nik” troll…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stewart J. Rodal v. Anesthesia Group of Onondaga, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Frank G. And Dianne G., Parents of a Disabled Student, Anthony G. v. Board of Education of Hyde Park, Central School District, Docket No. 04-4981-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Johnson v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Dam Things From Denmark, A/K/A Troll Company Aps v. Russ Berrie & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Nicholson v. ScoppettaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Derek Andrew, Inc. v. Poof Apparel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Fischer v. ForrestDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- O'KEEFE v. Ogilvy & Mather Worldwide, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Lopez v. TerrellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Granger v. Gill Abstract Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.