Legal Opinion

Raffellini v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 24, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Miller, J.P.

The plaintiff settled his action to recover damages for personal injuries against the tortfeasor for $25,000, the limit of the tortfeasor’s automobile liability policy, and subsequently commenced this breach of contract action against his own insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile. Insurance Company (hereinafter State Farm), to recover damages under the supplementary underinsured motorist endorsement of his policy. In this appeal, the issue is whether the insurer may raise as an affirmative defense the fact that the insured did not sustain a serious injury…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. MancusoNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Walton v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. In Re the Arbitration Between Lloyd & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meegan v. Progressive InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Meegan v. Progressive InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API