Legal Opinion

Musto v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 20, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Black, J.

This suit was brought to recover compensation for personal injuries to the plaintiff Henry Musto, Jr., an infant, and also to recover incidental damages to his father for loss of services and moneys expended in the curing of his son for the injuries sustained. The suit was brought against the defendants, City of Asbury Park and Edward T. Mitchell. The negligence charged against the defendant City of As-bury Park was that a broken milk bottle had been negligently left protruding and covered with sand on the bathing beach, which injured the knee…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pine Grove Nevada Gold Mining Co. v. FreemanNevada Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Caton v. FligAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API