Ernest 'Duke' Arnold v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JERTBERG, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, Ernest “Duke” Arnold, appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on July 9, 1962, for conspiring to violate 21 U.S.C.A. § 174. 1 Trial was to a jury. This appeal comes to us from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Northern Division. We will hereafter refer to this appeal as the instant case.
The errors assigned are three: (1) that appellant’s conviction is in violation of the Constitutional protection against double jeopardy; (2) that there is a fatal variance between the pleading and the proof; and (3) that evidence…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Morey v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Morgan v. DevineSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Ebeling v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. Benjamin MallahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Melvin MarableCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Emslie Leander Moore, United States of America v. Floyd Moore, United States of America v. Pieter Cornelis PannekoekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. David L. Smith, United States of America v. Herbert A. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.