Benintendi v. Hein
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter
¶1 Jesse and Tera Hein rented a house from Julia Benintendi and Joey and Sarah Perkerewicz (hereinafter B&P). B&P alleged the Heins caused considerable damage to the property when they vacated the premises. The Heins countered that B&P unlawfully retained their security deposit and refused to reimburse the Heins for home and lawn improvements. B&P sued and obtained a default judgment. Subsequently, the District Court set aside the default judgment and held a jury trial. B&P were awarded damages but not attorney fees or costs. They appeal. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
ISSUES
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stanley v. LemireMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Essex Insurance v. Moose's Saloon, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
- Plath v. SchonrockMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Blume v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Hughes v. AhlgrenMontana Supreme Court · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ditton v. Department of Justice Motor Vehicle DivisionMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Johnson Farms, Inc. v. HallandMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Musselshell Ranch Co. v. Seidel-JoukovaMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Carter v. Badrock RFDMontana Supreme Court · 2021
- Williamson v. Montana Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.