Legal Opinion

Wesche v. Mecosta County Road Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 2005No. Docket 251641PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

In this automobile negligence action, defendant Mecosta County Road Commission appeals as of right the trial court’s ruling that a Gradall hydraulic excavator is a motor vehicle for the purposes of the motor vehicle exception to governmental immunity found in MCL 691.1405. Plaintiffs Daniel J. and Beverly Wesche cross-appeal the trial court’s dismissal of Beverly Wesche’s loss-of-consortium claim. We affirm.

I. BASIC FACTS

It is undisputed that one afternoon in March 2000, Daniel Wesche stopped for a red traffic light at the intersection of State Street and Woodward Avenue in the city of Big…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stanton v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Berryman v. K Mart Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Chandler v. Muskegon CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Wessels v. Garden Way, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Regan v. Washtenaw County Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wesche v. Mecosta County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Willett v. Waterford Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Kalvin Candler v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Kik v. SbracciaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Kik v. SbracciaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API