Mader v. Taylor
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from the Third district court, Salt Lake county. Hon. John A. Street, Judge. Action by Charles Mader for money had and received against the Taylor-Romney-Armstrong Company and by the same against the Salt Lake Building and Manufacturing Company. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, District Judge:
These two causes, being dependent upon the same facts, were by consent tried together by the court without a jury. The findings were in favor of the defendants, and the actions dismissed at plaintiff’s cost. A motion for a new trial was made and denied, and an appeal taken from the judgment and order to this court. While an appeal will not lie to this court from an order denying a motion for a new trial, under section 9, art. 8, of the constitution of Utah, yet on appeal from the judgment the errors committed by the trial court in denying motion for new trial may be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- White v. PeaseUtah Supreme Court · 1897
- Bankhead v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1880
- Paragoonah Field & Canal Co. v. EdwardsUtah Supreme Court · 1894
- Slater v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1892
- Sterling v. ParsonsUtah Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. MacKey Price Thompson & OstlerUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Egelund v. FayterUtah Supreme Court · 1918
- Carlquist v. QuayleUtah Supreme Court · 1923
- Van Pelt v. ParkUtah Supreme Court · 1898