Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Eisenstadter

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 17, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, S.

In this discovery proceeding a question has been raised as to this court’s jurisdiction. A few of the facts are pertinent to the discussion. The proceeding was instituted by the administrator c. t. a. for discovery of certain assets allegedly owned by the decedent at the time of his death. Such assets consist of medical equipment, medical instruments, X-ray machines, furniture and other furnishings which belonged to the decedent, a physician, and were located in his medical offices. The respondent in this proceeding claims title to these assets by virtue of a written document…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of AkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. In re the Estate of LusherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. In re the Estate of CampbellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  4. In re the Estate of SichelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  5. In re the Estate of PatenotreNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of ReinerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API