Legal Opinion
Dimmitt v. Ockenfels
District Court, D. Maine
Decided March 9, 2004No. 03-170-P-DMCPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, TO DISMISS, FOR SANCTIONS AND TO STRIKE1
DAVID M. COHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the court are two motions for summary judgment, one filed by defendants Alfred Oekenfels, John Bagley, Matthew Lindahl and the City of Rockland (“Rockland defendants”) and one filed by defendants Daniel L. Davey, Richard Robbins and Knox County (“Knox defendants”);2 the plaintiffs motion to dismiss his claims against the Knox defendants; a motion for sanctions filed by the Knox defendants; and a motion to strike portions of the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Estate of Bennett v. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Berube v. ConleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Ayotte v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2013
- Jackson v. Town of WaldoboroDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010
- Brown v. DickeyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.