Legal Opinion
Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1996No. 1995-2157PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 163.] CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL. APPELLEES. [Cite as Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.,
1996-Ohio-296.] Public Utilities Commission—Commission does not abuse its discretion by refusing to express an opinion on the non-rate aspects of Garfield Heights ordinances dealing with electric rates—Commission has discretion to assess hearing costs and expenses. (No. 95-2157—Submitted June 5, 1996—Decided July 31, 1996.) APPEAL from the Public…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Industrial Energy Consumers of Ohio Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Indus. Energy Consumers of Ohio Power Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Application of Alamo Solar I, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
- In re Determination of Existence of Significantly Excessive Earnings for 2017 Under the Elec. Sec. Plan of Ohio Edison Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- In re OVEC Generational Purchase Rider Audits Required by R.C. 4928.148Ohio Supreme Court · 2026