Legal Opinion

State v. Ercolano

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 12, 1979Published

1Opinion of the Court

79 N.J. 25 (1979)

397 A.2d 1062

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

ANTHONY ERCOLANO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued May 9, 1978.

Decided January 12, 1979.

Mr. Paul A. Massaro, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. John H. Stamler, Prosecutor, attorney).

Mr. William F. Lamb, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey (Mr. John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Mr. David R. Arrajj, designated counsel, argued the cause for amicus curiae Public Defender of New Jersey (Mr. Stanley…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Pashman; Dissent · Schreiber; Dissent · Handler; Concurrence · Pashman.

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API