Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Sims

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 21, 1924No. 14846Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

2Per curiam

The matters complained of in' the petition in error are matters wihch arose during the trial of the case, and a motion for new trial is necessary to a consideration of these alleged errors in this court. The verdict aud judgment in this case were entered April 20, 1923, and the motion for new trial was thereafter filed April 24th, 'The motion for new I rial was considered and acted upon by the trial court May 3, 1923. It is provided by Oomp. Stat. 1921, sec. 3072, that the terms of district court in Rogers county shall begin on the first Monday in May and December, respectively.…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McAdams v. LathamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Riely v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Gardner v. BlantonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Armstrong v. State Ex Rel. FainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Hastings v. DonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API