Legal Opinion

Vickery v. Estate of Brockman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries she sustained when she slipped and fell on snow or ice. Supreme Court properly denied the motion and cross motion of defendants seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendants Estate of Leah Brockman and executors of the Estate (Estate) failed to meet their initial burden of establishing that they owed no duty to plaintiff to maintain the *914property in a reasonably safe condition (see generally, Di Ponzio v Riordan, 89 NY2d 578, 582-583; Basso v Miller, 40 NY2d 233,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Di Ponzio v. RiordanNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Marcellus v. Nathan Littauer Hospital Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Cerra v. Perk DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Siegel v. MolinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Santerre v. Golub Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Frazier v. Pioneer Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Rapini v. New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. SMITH, TERESA G. v. UNITED REFINING COMPANY OF PENNSYLVAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Smith v. United Refining Co. of PennsylvaniaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API