Legal Opinion
MacKenzie v. Empire Insurance Companies
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1989No. 55798-5PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Andersen, J.—
Facts of Case
The issue in this case has been certified to us by the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. It concerns whether a special multi-peril insurance policy, covering various business perils, and including an endorsement for comprehensive automobile liability insurance (which is asserted to provide coverage only in excess of primary automobile insurance policies covering the automobile involved in this case) is exempt from the requirements of Washington's underinsured motorist statute (RCW 48.22.030).
On January 28, 1983, Denice MacKenzie's…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- In re the Arbitration between Matarasso & Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Moser v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Thompson v. GRANGE INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Doto v. RussoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- United National Insurance v. DePrizioIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Diaz v. National Car Rental Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.