Legal Opinion

Amorosa v. Jersey City Welding & MacH. Works

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 4, 1986PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

214 N.J. Super. 130 (1986)

518 A.2d 529

FREDERICK AMOROSA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v.

JERSEY CITY WELDING & MACHINE WORKS (INCORRECTLY REFERRED TO AS J.C. WELDING CO.), RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 23, 1986.

Decided December 4, 1986.

Before Judges MICHELS, SKILLMAN and LANDAU.

D. Gayle Loftis argued the cause on behalf of appellant.

Patrick J. McAuley argued the cause on behalf of respondent (Connell, Foley and Geiser, attorneys; George J. Kenny, of counsel; Edward Solensky, Jr., on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Simon v. New Jersey Asphalt & Paving Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
  2. Atamanik v. Real Estate Management, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Cohrs v. Igoe Brothers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  4. Kasiski v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  5. Harbatuk v. S & S Furniture Systems InsulationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hollandsworth v. Nebraska PartnersNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Leitz v. Roberts DairyNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Dunlevy v. Kemper Ins. GroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  4. QUERESHI v. Cintas Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  5. Della Rosa v. Van-Rad Contracting Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API