Legal Opinion
Antonio Guyton v. City of Stockton, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 29, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00922Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTONIO GUYTON, No. 2:24-cv-0922 DC AC PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CITY OF STOCKTON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly 18 referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff was given permission to 19 proceed in forma pauperis on May 31, 2024, and his initial complaint was rejected for service 20 pursuant to the screening process that accompanies IFP status. ECF No. 3.…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.