Legal Opinion

Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. v. Dresser

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 5, 1919No. 21892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Porter Parker, Judge. Action by the Hibernia Bank & Trust Company against John M. Dresser, with the J. M, Dresser, Company Limited, as garnishee. On rule to show cause why interrogatories should not be taken for confessed. Rule dismissed, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.

[1] The plaintiff bank, having obtained judgment against the defendant, J. M. Dresser, garnisheed the J. M. Dresser Company, Limited. The president of this company answered the interrogatories virtute officii and also under authority of the hereinafter referred to resolution of the board of directors. The plaintiff bank traversed the answers, and asked that the interrogatories be taken for confessed, and that the garnishee be condemned to pay the debt. Thereafter the plaintiff bank voluntarily dismissed the garnishment proceeding. Two years later it renewed it and again the same president,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cusachs v. DugueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. Rose & McCarthy v. Whaley & EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
  3. Tapp v. GreenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1870

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Acadian Production Corp. v. Savanna Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  2. Dunham-Pugh Co. v. StephensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  3. Schreiber v. Beer's Widow & HeirsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API