Legal Opinion

Gallas v. Sanchez

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1965No. 4348PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MIZUHA, J.

Plaintiff-appellant Nesta M. Gallas appeals from a judgment on a directed verdict in favor of defendantsappellees Pedro N. Sanchez, Albert P. Moniz and Masao Watanabe, individually and as members of the Civil Service Commission of the City and County of Honolulu, and the City and County of Honolulu, a municipal corporation of the State of Hawaii, whom she sued for special and general damages, alleging that defendants unlawfully dismissed her from her position as personnel director of the City and County of Honolulu.

Two principal questions are involved in this…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  4. Glover v. FongHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Jordan v. Metropolitan Sanitary DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Querubin v. ThronasHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Chun v. Bd. of Trustees of ERSHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Wong v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Bulatao v. Kauai Motors, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API