Legal Opinion

State v. Peck

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1990No. 16826PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice.

In this opinion we affirm a conviction of tampering with a witness, holding that (1) the indictment adequately apprised the defendant of the charges, and (2) there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction.

FACTS

In January, 1987, Terri Pennington (then age 16) purchased a quantity of marijuana from her boyfriend, Mark Hildebrand (age approximately 26). In the presence of her mother, Pennington gave a written statement to Division of Criminal Investigation Agent Boots admitting to purchasing the marijuana for $35.00. Prior to any arrest of Hildebrand, Pennington was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. LogueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. United States v. Paul E. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Phillip Ray JeterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  4. State v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. JennerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. McDonaldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ChargerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. AdamsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. AdamsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. BlackSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API