Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sealy State Bank of Sealy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 4, 1933No. 9842PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

This appeal by the plaintiff below is from a judgment of the trial court wherein respective general demurrers and motions of the opposing parties challenging the sufficiency of the proceedings were sustained and • the writ of garnishment quashed, the judgment in full being as follows:

*487“E. E. Smith vs. Sealy State Bank of Sealy, Texas, Garnishee.
“No. 6394
“In the District -Court of Austin County, Texas, January Term, A. D. 1932.
“29th day of January, A. D. 1932.
“On this day came on to be heard the above-entitled- and numbered cause, wherein E. E. Smith is plaintiff in garnishment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Teague v. FairchildTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Carter Bros. & Co. v. BushTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Gillespie v. LovellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  4. W. C. Howard & Co. v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892
  5. Shedd v. McConnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Betzen v. Exxon Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1985
  2. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n v. First Nat. Bank of WaurikaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Big Spring Tractor Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API