Thomas & Howard Co. v. Trimark Catastrophe Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.
Thomas & Howard Company, Inc. (“plaintiff’) appeals from an order granting Trimark Catastrophe Services’ (“defendant”) motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process and resulting lack of personal jurisdiction. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the ruling of the trial court.
Defendant is a Texas corporation authorized to conduct business in North Carolina with a registered office located in Mooresville, North Carolina and a designated registered agent for service, Bill Highsmith. In September of 1996, defendant entered into a contract with plaintiff, a food…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Parker v. Thompson-Arthur Paving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Purser v. Heatherlin PropertiesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Johnson v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Glover v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Fulton v. MickleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Garrett v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- Stewart v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- Baldwin v. Maiden Police DepartmentDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2024
- Dixon v. PatelDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2025
- Ebony Sherisse Lucas v. Michael Manley, Jay Lnu, and Colin RundellDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2026
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.