Hernandez v. Williams
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin
Following a trial for which the defendant demanded that a jury be impaneled and at which the defendant presented no evidence on his own behalf, the plaintiff, James Hernandez, moved that sanctions be imposed on the defendant’s counsel, the law firm of Moss & Hillison, for violations of Supreme Court Rule 137 (134 Ill. 2d R. 137) (Rule 137). The trial court granted the plaintiff’s motion and imposed sanctions of $2,525. We affirm.
The facts are simple. This was a small claims case. The plaintiff’s complaint alleged that the defendant had negligently caused damage to the plaintiff’s vehicle.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mars Steel Corp. v. Continental Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Yassin v. Certified Grocers of Illinois, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. Leroy KendrickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- People v. ChriswellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bachmann v. KentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Ashley v. ScottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Habitat Co. v. McClureAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- In Re Marriage of OleksyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Koch v. CarmonaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.