Legal Opinion

Pekin Insurance v. Richard Marker Associates, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 1997No. 2-96-0624PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Colwell

Defendants, Richard Marker Associates, Inc., and Richard Marker, appeal the trial court’s entry of judgment on the pleadings for plaintiff, Pekin Insurance Company, in its action for a declaration that it had no duty to defend defendants in an action by Leon Yuan, Angela Yuan, and Leon Yuan, Ph.D., D.D.S. Ltd. (Yuans). The sole issue for review is whether the trial court erred in finding that plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured when the underlying complaint alleged damage to other property.

Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking a declaration that it had no duty to defend defendants in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Crum & Forster Managers Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. PeppersIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Stoneridge Development Co. v. Essex InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  2. Auto-Owners Insurance v. Home Pride Companies, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. VIKING CONST. MAN. v. Liberty Mut. Ins.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Lagestee-Mulder, Inc. v. Consolidated InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Viking Construction Management, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API