Legal Opinion

Stoneridge Development Co. v. Essex Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 6, 2008No. 2-06-1166PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman

At issue in this case is whether Essex Insurance Company (Essex) is required to provide coverage to its insured, Stoneridge Development Company, Inc., as well as to an additional insured under the policy, Highland Glen Associates (collectively Stoneridge). The policy came into play after homeowners John and Marie Walski brought suit against Stoneridge for damage to their townhome, allegedly caused by Stoneridge’s construction of the residence on and/or near improperly compacted soil. The Walskis also sought relief from Residential Warranty Corporation and its underwriter, Western Pacific…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Crum & Forster Managers Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Addison Insurance v. FayIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Standard Mutual Insurance Co. v. LayIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Lyerla v. AMCO InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Lagestee-Mulder, Inc. v. Consolidated InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. K & L Homes, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API