James Greenway v. Information Dynamics, Ltd., Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before ELY and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge.* PER CURIAM:
We adopt the careful reasoning of Judge Copple, reported at 399 F.Supp. 1092 (D.Ariz.1975). The only contention here made by the appellant is that it is not a “consumer reporting agency”. Under the Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act’s definition of a “consumer report” (15 U.S.C. § 1681a(d)), the appellant’s argument must be rejected. Not only does a report of the previous issuance of an unpayable check bear “on a consumer’s credit worthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Greenway v. Information Dynamics, Ltd.District Court, D. Arizona · 1974
3Cited by20 opinions
- Washington v. CSC Credit Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Andrews v. Trans Union Corp., Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Cisneros v. U.D. Registry, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Estiverne v. Sak's Fifth AvenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Howard v. Blue Ridge BankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.