Legal Opinion

Tanenbaum v. Caputo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Malone, J.), dated April 6, 2010, as denied his motion for an award of an attorney’s fee in the sum of $11,106.90.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“Where the parties have agreed to provisions in a settlement agreement which govern the award of attorney’s fees, the agreement’s provisions, rather than statutory provisions, control” (Matter of Berns v Halberstam, 46 AD3d 808, 809 [2007]; see…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Berns v. HalberstamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Arato v. AratoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Momberger v. MombergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Tanenbaum v. MolinoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Momberger v. MombergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Tanenbaum v. MolinoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API