Legal Opinion
MAUM Meditation House of Truth v. Lake County
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 16, 2014No. 13-cv-3794PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHARON JOHNSON COLEMAN, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs, MAUM Meditation House of Truth, certain of its members and Sheeh-yung Sung (collectively “MAUM” or “plaintiffs”), filed an Amended Complaint after this Court’s denial of MAUM’s motion for preliminary injunction and MAUM’s acquiescence that it should pursue an appeal with the zoning board before proceeding with the instant action. Defendant Lake County moves to dismiss the Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim [34], MAUM renewed its motion for preliminary injunction [31]. For the reasons set…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Arnett v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dyson v. City of Calumet CityDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Jucha v. City of North ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Tri-State Disposal, Inc. v. Vill. of Riverdale, Corp.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
- Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Kan. City in Kan. v. City of Mission WoodsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Dyson v. The City of Calumet CityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.