Legal Opinion

Padulo v. Schneider

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 25, 1952No. Gen. 45,595PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Kiley

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action brought against a tavern owner for damages for personal injuries to a female patron. Count I of the complaint is brought under the Dram Shop Act, and Count II under the common law. Issues were joined on Count I. One of the defendants named in Count II moved to strike that count. The motion was sustained and the second count was dismissed. Plaintiff stood by the second count and has appealed from the judgment of dismissal.

The judgment is appealable because it disposes definitively of a distinct cause of action.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mastad v. BrethrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Rommel v. SchambacherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  3. Curran v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Cherbonnier v. RafalovichDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1950
  5. Sidebottom v. AubreyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weber v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  2. Welch v. Railroad Crossing, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. GRIESENBECK EX REL. KUTTNER v. WalkerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. Motz v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API