Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Robert ORR/SYSCO Food Services Co. v. Jackson

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 26, 1999No. 2971303Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partThompson, Judge

I concur except to the extent the award of workers’ compensation benefits is based on an injury to the worker’s left knee. I disagree with the majority’s determination that Jackson’s injury to his left knee was compensable. I do not find substantial evidence in the record to support a finding that Jackson suffered trauma to his left knee in the June 25,1993, accident.

In order to prove that an injury is compensable under the Workers’ Com*512pensation Act, a claimant must prove by substantial evidence that an on-the-job accident caused the injury. § 25-5-31, Ala. Code 1975; Ex parte Moncrief, 627…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Ex Parte MoncriefSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Ex Parte PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Blue Water Catfish, Inc. v. HallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  5. Eddy v. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API