Legal Opinion

Pollock v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 27, 1924No. A-4344PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatson, P. J.

(after stating facts as above). The first assignment of error urged by counsel is:

“The learned trial court erred in excluding competent and relevant testimony offered by the plaintiff in error.”

Defendant offered Nora (Quinn) Moring as a witness to prove that the deceased came upon the plaintiff in error with a knife at the time of the shooting. The testimony given by said witness is as follows:

“Q. How did he open the bottle of whisky, Mrs. Moring? A. He opened it with a knife. Q. Can you tell the jury what kind of a knife it was? A. Well, it was a knife; I couldn’t— right at the time I paid…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. FrisbeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Stouse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Bloom v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Willis v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Born v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Holt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Womble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Rich v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API