Legal Opinion
Pollock v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 27, 1924No. A-4344PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatson, P. J.
(after stating facts as above). The first assignment of error urged by counsel is:
“The learned trial court erred in excluding competent and relevant testimony offered by the plaintiff in error.”
Defendant offered Nora (Quinn) Moring as a witness to prove that the deceased came upon the plaintiff in error with a knife at the time of the shooting. The testimony given by said witness is as follows:
“Q. How did he open the bottle of whisky, Mrs. Moring? A. He opened it with a knife. Q. Can you tell the jury what kind of a knife it was? A. Well, it was a knife; I couldn’t— right at the time I paid…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. FrisbeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Stouse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Bloom v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
- Willis v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Born v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964
- Holt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Womble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
- Rich v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.